Qonversion alternative

Tierux — the Qonversion alternative

Qonversion earns its keep on analytics — cohorts, attribution, and revenue dashboards. If reporting isn't the center of your workflow, you may be paying a 0.6% revenue share mostly for dashboards you rarely open. Tierux takes the opposite bet: agent-automated store setup, server-side entitlements, and a flat monthly price.

CapabilityTieruxQonversion
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup
Android-native depthCore focusSupported, cross-platform
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes, mature
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribers0.6% of MRR above $10,000/mo free threshold
Remote paywall configYesYes
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetLimited
Paywall A/B testing & experimentsNot yetBasic
Subscription analyticsEntitlement analytics dashboardExtensive, analytics-heavy
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, mid-scale

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Qonversion's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on analytics depth — that's Qonversion's strength.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

Verification and entitlements are what you actually need — analytics is a nice-to-have; you'd rather have an MCP agent provision Google Cloud credentials and store products than click through consoles; you're Google Play-first, with App Store support shipping today too; and you prefer a bill that stays $39/mo instead of scaling with MRR.

Choose Qonversion if…

Subscription analytics, attribution, and cross-platform cohort reporting drive your decisions daily, and trading 0.6% of MRR above the free threshold for a mature analytics engine is a fair deal for your team.

Also see the head-to-head: Tierux vs Qonversion · all alternatives compared.

Frequently asked questions
What is a good Qonversion alternative?
Tierux is a Qonversion alternative for teams that care more about server-side purchase verification and entitlement management than analytics dashboards. It adds AI-agent-powered store setup over MCP and flat pricing — $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers instead of a 0.6% revenue share on MRR.
How does Tierux pricing compare to Qonversion?
Qonversion charges 0.6% of MRR above a $10,000/mo free tier — $540/mo at $100k MRR. Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000, so costs track subscriber count rather than revenue and are typically much lower at scale.
Does Tierux have subscription analytics like Qonversion?
Tierux ships an entitlement analytics dashboard — verifications over time and a live status breakdown (active, grace period, account hold, cancelled, expired). It does not match Qonversion's cohort, attribution, and revenue reporting depth; if that's central to your workflow, Qonversion is the stronger fit today.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Qonversion's store configuration is manual across the Google Play and Apple consoles.

Entitlements first, flat price always

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free