Comparison

Tierux vs Qonversion

Qonversion built its reputation on rich subscription analytics and cross-platform dashboards — teams that live inside their MRR charts and cohort reports gravitate toward it. Tierux takes a different angle: strip the manual store-setup toil by handing it to an AI agent over MCP, charge a flat fee per subscriber, and put Android on equal footing with iOS. Here's the honest breakdown — including where Qonversion is ahead.

CapabilityTieruxQonversion
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup
Android-native depthCore focusSupported, cross-platform
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes, mature
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribers0.6% of MRR above $10,000/mo free threshold
Remote paywall configYesYes
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetLimited
Paywall A/B testing & experimentsNot yetBasic
Subscription analyticsEntitlement analytics dashboardExtensive, analytics-heavy
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, mid-scale

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Qonversion's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on analytics depth — that's Qonversion's strength.

Teams that pick Qonversion typically run established subscription apps where understanding user cohorts and revenue trends is the primary day-to-day workflow. The trade-off is price: at $100,000 MRR, Qonversion's 0.6% fee comes to $540/mo, while Tierux charges the same flat $39/mo regardless of how large your revenue grows.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

Your team wants the store-credential plumbing handled by an AI agent — Google Cloud APIs, products, and paywalls provisioned in one prompt — rather than clicking through console screens; you care more about predictable monthly costs (flat $39/mo) than deep analytics dashboards; and you're building for Android with equal or greater priority than iOS (App Store support ships today too), where Tierux's native Kotlin SDK provides deeper platform integration.

Choose Qonversion if…

Subscription analytics, revenue attribution, and cross-platform cohort reports are the lens through which your team makes every business decision, and you're willing to trade a percentage of MRR for a mature analytics engine with mid-scale community adoption.

Frequently asked questions
How does Tierux compare to Qonversion?
Tierux is an AI-agent-native, MCP-driven subscription platform with flat pricing and Android-native depth. Qonversion is an analytics-heavy, cross-platform subscription infrastructure tool with revenue-share pricing at 0.6% of MRR above $10,000/mo free. Tierux replaces manual setup with automated agent workflows.
What is Tierux's pricing compared to Qonversion?
Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000. Qonversion charges 0.6% of MRR above a $10,000/mo free tier. At $100,000 MRR, Qonversion costs $540/mo vs Tierux's flat pricing that typically comes in much lower.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Qonversion requires manual setup across both Google Play and Apple consoles.
Is Tierux suitable for cross-platform apps?
Yes. Tierux supports both Google Play and Apple App Store with server-side verification for both platforms. Android is a core focus with a native Kotlin SDK; iOS verification is handled server-side with Swift SDK source available for audit and local integration.

Try the AI-native path

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free