Comparison

Tierux vs Superwall

Most teams running Superwall pair it with RevenueCat to cover entitlements — two services, two bills. Tierux ships the full stack (paywalls + built-in entitlement API) in a single platform — Android-first with growing App Store support — with flat pricing that never takes a percentage of revenue. Here's the honest breakdown — including where Superwall is ahead.

CapabilityTieruxSuperwall
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup across two consoles
Android-native depthCore focusSupported, iOS-led
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Standalone entitlement APIBuilt-inNone — often paired with RevenueCat
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribers1% of monthly attributed revenue, free ≤ $10,000/mo
Remote paywall configYesYes
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetYes
Paywall A/B testing & experimentsNot yetCore strength
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, large scale

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Superwall's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on paywall experimentation — that's Superwall's strength.

On setup: Superwall requires manual Google Play and Apple store configuration. Tierux's agent automates the Google Cloud service account and APIs; Apple needs your Bundle ID plus one manual notification-URL step.

Superwall plays a distinct role in the subscription ecosystem — its sweet spot is growth teams running paid acquisition who need rapid paywall iteration and have already adopted RevenueCat for entitlements. If you're starting fresh and want to avoid juggling two vendors for a single subscription flow, the all-in-one path may save you a recurring integration headache.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

You want paywalls and entitlements under one roof — not two services duct-taped together — with a built-in entitlement API included, AI-agent setup that provisions Google Cloud service accounts in one prompt, flat per-subscriber pricing that never scales with revenue, and Android-native depth as a first-class priority rather than a secondary platform.

Choose Superwall if…

Paywall A/B testing and experimentation are what moves your conversion needle, you're already comfortable running RevenueCat alongside a paywall tool, and a 1% revenue-share model is acceptable for a mature, battle-tested paywall infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions
How does Tierux compare to Superwall for subscription billing?
Tierux is an AI-agent-native, MCP-driven subscription platform with flat pricing and built-in entitlement management. Superwall is a paywall infrastructure leader focused on remote paywall configuration and experimentation — often paired with RevenueCat for entitlements. Tierux provides the full stack (store setup, verification, entitlements, paywalls) in one product.
Does Superwall handle entitlements?
No — Superwall does not offer a standalone entitlement API. Many teams pair Superwall for paywalls with RevenueCat for entitlement tracking. Tierux provides both paywall configuration and entitlement management in a single platform.
What is Tierux's pricing compared to Superwall?
Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000. Superwall charges 1% of total monthly attributed revenue, free up to $10,000/mo. At scale, Tierux's flat pricing often costs significantly less than a percentage of revenue.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Superwall requires manual setup across both Google Play and Apple consoles.

Try the AI-native path

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free