Comparison

Tierux vs Nami

Nami stood out for its paywall CMS combined with ML-driven optimization — a genuinely innovative pairing for its time. Since its acquisition, however, public updates have slowed and the roadmap has gone quiet. Tierux steps into that gap with an AI-agent-native stack, active development, and flat pricing. Here's the honest breakdown.

CapabilityTieruxNami
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup
Android-native depthCore focusSupported
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribersRevenue-share (pre-acquisition)
Remote paywall configYesCMS-focused
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetLimited — basic win-back tooling
ML paywall optimizationNot yetCore feature (stalled)
Active developmentActively developedDiminished public roadmap
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, acquired

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Nami's publicly documented platform. Nami was acquired and its public roadmap has diminished; its ML paywall optimization was innovative for its time.

Nami's ML-driven paywall optimization was ahead of the curve — few tools at the time let you automatically tune paywall elements based on visitor behavior. If your team is currently on Nami and the paywall CMS still does what you need, migrating isn't urgent. But for new projects or teams weighing a move, an actively maintained platform avoids the risk of building on a codebase that may not see feature investment in the near term.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

An active, publicly committed product roadmap matters to your team — you're not comfortable building on an acquired tool whose future direction is uncertain; MCP agent automation for store credentials and provisioning replaces time spent inside Google Play Console; a flat $39/mo subscription keeps costs predictable regardless of revenue growth; and you're Google Play-first, with App Store support shipping today too.

Choose Nami if…

You're already on Nami and its paywall CMS workflow is working for you — but with a diminished public roadmap since acquisition, evaluate whether an actively maintained alternative with AI-agent automation better positions your billing infrastructure for the next few years.

Frequently asked questions
How does Tierux compare to Nami?
Tierux is an AI-agent-native, MCP-driven subscription platform with flat pricing and Android-native depth. Nami is a paywall CMS platform with ML paywall optimization that was acquired and has a diminished public roadmap. Tierux offers a complete billing stack including store setup, verification, entitlements, and paywalls.
Is Nami still actively developed?
Nami was acquired; check their latest updates before committing. The platform's paywall CMS and ML optimization features have seen limited public updates. Tierux is actively developed with a focus on AI-agent-native workflows.
What is Tierux's pricing compared to Nami?
Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000. Nami's pricing was revenue-share based before acquisition. Tierux's flat pricing means predictable costs that don't scale with your revenue.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Nami requires manual setup across both Google Play and Apple consoles.

Try the AI-native path

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free