Comparison

Tierux vs Glassfy

Glassfy carved a niche with small and medium subscription apps by keeping costs at zero until $10,000 in monthly tracked revenue — after which it takes 1%. Tierux competes on a different axis: charge a flat $39/mo from day one (with no ceiling on that flat rate as you grow), add AI-agent store provisioning via MCP, and treat Android as a core platform rather than a feature checkbox. Here's the honest breakdown — including where Glassfy is ahead.

CapabilityTieruxGlassfy
Agent-run store setupGoogle Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL stepManual setup
Android-native depthCore focusSupported
iOS / App Store verificationYes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path)Yes
Server-side verificationStore-verified on our servers, zero-trust clientYes
Pricing modelFlat $39/mo up to 1,000 subscribersFree ≤ $10k MTR, then 1%
Remote paywall configYesYes
Win-back / cancellation offersGoogle Play — yes; App Store — not yetYes
Open-source SDKsAndroid + iOS source availableOpen-source SDKs
Paywall A/B testing & experimentsNot yetYes
Scale & tractionPre-launch — we're honest about our stageProven, SMB-focused

Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Glassfy's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on maturity — Glassfy has been at this longer.

The Glassfy path works best for teams just validating their subscription model — the free tier is genuinely generous and lets you ship without upfront cost. Once you cross roughly 1,000 subscribers (where Tierux costs $39/mo), the calculus starts to shift: Glassfy's 1% overage on tracked revenue can outpace fixed pricing, and you still need to manually wire up store consoles that Tierux automates through its MCP agent.

When to choose which

Choose Tierux if…

You'd rather know your bill exactly every month — $39 flat, period — and have it stay flat while your subscriber count climbs; an MCP agent that provisions Google Cloud service accounts and store products in a single prompt replaces your console-switching routine; Android depth with a native Kotlin SDK is a non-negotiable (App Store support ships today too); and you want a platform that doesn't take 1% of revenue once you cross the $10k threshold.

Choose Glassfy if…

A free tier that runs up to $10,000 MTR is the right on-ramp for your small subscription app, open-source transparency matters to your development philosophy, and you value a community-adopted tool with established SMB patterns and documentation.

Frequently asked questions
How does Tierux compare to Glassfy?
Tierux is an AI-agent-native, MCP-driven subscription platform with flat pricing and Android-native depth. Glassfy is an open-source, SMB-focused subscription platform with free tier up to $10k MTR and 1% after. Tierux brings AI-agent store setup automation and deeper Android support.
What is Tierux's pricing compared to Glassfy?
Tierux charges a flat $39/mo for up to 1,000 subscribers, then +$30/1,000. Glassfy is free up to $10,000 in monthly tracked revenue, then charges 1% above that. Flat pricing can be more predictable at scale.
Does Glassfy support Android well?
Glassfy supports both iOS and Android, but is primarily SMB-focused. Tierux treats Android as a core focus with a native Kotlin SDK and deeper Google Play Billing integration.
Can an AI agent set up Tierux?
Yes. Tierux's MCP server lets your AI agent automate store setup — Google Cloud service accounts, APIs, products, and paywalls — in one prompt. Glassfy requires manual setup across both Google Play and Apple consoles.

Try the AI-native path

Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.

Start free