Adapty leans into paywall A/B testing and subscription analytics. Tierux leans into AI-agent setup, Android-native depth, and flat pricing. Here's the honest breakdown — including where Adapty is ahead.
| Capability | Tierux | Adapty |
|---|---|---|
| Agent-run store setup | Google Cloud service account + APIs automated; Apple = Bundle ID + one manual notification-URL step | Manual setup |
| Android-native depth | Core focus | Supported, iOS-led |
| iOS / App Store verification | Yes, with limitations (Swift SDK + server verifier; less production-hardened than our Play path) | Yes, mature |
| Server-side verification | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Flat monthly fee | MTU / revenue-based above free tier |
| Remote paywall config | Yes | Yes |
| Win-back / cancellation offers | Google Play — yes; App Store — not yet | Yes |
| Paywall A/B testing & experiments | Not yet | Core strength |
| Deep subscription analytics | Entitlement analytics | Extensive |
| Scale & traction | Pre-launch | Proven |
Comparison reflects Tierux's shipped capabilities and Adapty's publicly documented platform. We don't claim parity on experimentation or analytics depth — that's Adapty's strength.
You want your AI agent to stand up billing over MCP — store credentials, products, and paywalls — without bouncing between consoles; you're Google Play-first or building for both platforms (App Store support ships today too); and you prefer flat, predictable pricing that never takes a cut of revenue.
Paywall A/B testing and deep subscription analytics are central to how you operate, and you want a platform built primarily around experimentation and reporting today.
Free tier — unlimited apps, 1 paywall. No credit card, no revenue share.
Start free